Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Selects Leading Research Information Management Platform, Symplectic Elements

Auto Draft 4

1 August 2020

We are pleased to announce Cedars-Sinai Medical Center has selected Symplectic Elements as their research information management platform. Cedars Sinai is a multi-specialty non-profit academic hospital located in Los Angeles with strong ties to UCLA and the University of Southern California. 

Cedars Sinai focuses on biomedical research and technologically advanced medical education based on interdisciplinary collaboration between physicians and clinical researchers. They rank among the top non-university hospitals in the US for competitive research funding from the National Institutes of Health and currently have more than 1,845 research projects, many led by physician-scientists.

The team at Cedars Sinai plans to use our Faculty Reporting Solution and Discovery Module solutions to support their research data management goals.

About Cedars-Sinai Medical Center:

Cedars-Sinai is a nonprofit academic healthcare organization serving the diverse Los Angeles community and beyond. With pioneering medical research achievements, education programs defining the future of healthcare, and wide-ranging community benefit activities, we’re setting new standards for quality and innovation in patient care.


Please join us in welcoming the team at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to the Symplectic community! 


Elements elegantly connected our multi-university system providing a
single source of truth throughout OIEx.

Tim Cain, The Ohio Innovation Exchange (OIEx)

The University measures the individual research activity of academic staff. This Measure of Research Activity (MoRA) requires the collection of publication data from faculty. Symplectic Elements supports this beautifully.

Floris van der Leest, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

[Elements] will help to bring transparency to the richness of thought showcased within non-traditional publications, providing a more holistic representation of faculties’ scholarly work.

Caleb Smith, University of Michigan

Feedback to date has been extremely positive from all levels across the University, with individual academics and colleagues actively promoting the ease of use of the system.

Rachel Baird, Research Policy Analyst, University of Liverpool