Dimensions for Universities Update: Improved Search and New Visualisations

We’re happy to announce that our funding analysis and benchmarking tool, Dimensions for Universities, has now been updated to include some very useful new features.

Dimensions for Universities is an analytical tool, built by ÜberResearch, that helps institutions visualise and understand the funding landscape.

Version 2.6 now includes the following improvements:

Extended search options

Previously, Dimensions allowed users to search by title or abstract. User feedback indicated this was not broad enough, and that searching by Grant ID or researcher name would be useful.  In version 2.6, users can search either by just the abstract and title, or by all project fields (title, abstract, organisation, researcher, project ID).


Dimensions for Universities search options


New visualisations

Another feature requested by many users was the ‘geo-bubble’ map. This new visualisation shows the distribution of projects or funding amounts on a global map. This functionality can be found in the Analyse section and is currently available for the US, Canada and Australia (In future, it will cover Europe too). You can now view the geo-bubbles for any search or filter combination.


Dimensions for Universities Geo-map


We hope users find these updates helpful. If you have any questions or feedback, don’t hesitate to contact us. For more information on Dimensions for Universities, see our product page.

Elements elegantly connected our multi-university system providing a
single source of truth throughout OIEx.

Tim Cain, The Ohio Innovation Exchange (OIEx)

The University measures the individual research activity of academic staff. This Measure of Research Activity (MoRA) requires the collection of publication data from faculty. Symplectic Elements supports this beautifully.

Floris van der Leest, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

[Elements] will help to bring transparency to the richness of thought showcased within non-traditional publications, providing a more holistic representation of faculties’ scholarly work.

Caleb Smith, University of Michigan

Feedback to date has been extremely positive from all levels across the University, with individual academics and colleagues actively promoting the ease of use of the system.

Rachel Baird, Research Policy Analyst, University of Liverpool